
Anna Burnside
Head of Sale




£6,000 - £8,000

Head of Sale

Director

Head of Department
Provenance
Rev'd C J Sharp Collection, Sotheby's, 10 March 1964, lot 98 (as Liverpool)
Watney Collection, Phillips, 10 May 2000, lot 459
Anton Gabszewicz Collection
Literature
Ross Ramsay and Anton Gabszewicz, 'The Chemistry of 'A'-Marked Porcelain and its relation to the Heylyn and Frye Patent of 1744', ECC Trans, Vol.18, Pt.2 (2003), fig.9
Bow teapots of this early class are exceedingly rare. Contrary to the contemporary incised triangle tea wares being produced at Chelsea, Bow sought to interpret Chinese porcelain of the Kangxi period. The drab-coloured body and blue-grey glaze does give the soft-paste porcelain an ersatz oriental appearance.
Ramsay and Gabszewicz illustrate the present lot alongside a Bow mug with a similar seeded border in the Victoria and Albert Museum (inv. no.C.63-1938). Like the present lot, the mug had been classified as Liverpool porcelain for much of the 20th century. The small jug, lot 124 in this sale relates very closely to the teapot, down to the fine, elegant handle with a kick at the lower terminal. The glaze pools within the confinement of the dry footrims of both pieces. On the teapot this glaze has stopped short of the footrim at one point, a hint of the characteristic 'dry apron' seen on some of the earliest pieces of Bow. A fingerprint is visible in the fine red line border, a memento of the workman who made it.