![[Americana.]](/_next/image.jpg?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimg2.bonhams.com%2Fimage%3Fsrc%3DImages%252Flive%252F2006-09%252F22%252F7332891-4-1.JPG%26width%3D650&w=2400&q=75)
![CALEPINO, AMBROGIO. 1435-1511. [Dictionarium.] Calepinus Ad librum. Mos est putidas.... Venice: Peter Liechtenstein, January 3, 1509.](/_next/image.jpg?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimg2.bonhams.com%2Fimage%3Fsrc%3DImages%252Flive%252F2012-08%252F09%252F8520323-124-1.jpg%26width%3D650&w=2400&q=75)
![HEARN, LAFCADIO. 1850-1904. [Japanese Fairy Tales.] Philadelphia: Macrae-Smith, [But Tokyo: T. Hasegawa,] [c.1931].](/_next/image.jpg?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimg2.bonhams.com%2Fimage%3Fsrc%3DImages%252Flive%252F2025-11%252F07%252F25776056-1-1.jpg%26width%3D650&w=2400&q=75)
This auction has ended. View lot details
You may also be interested in
Lot 49
NEWTON, ISAAC. 1642-1727. Autograph Manuscript in Latin, 2 pp, 4to (199 x 155 mm), [np], [c. 1670], being an unpublished listing of chemical authors with some citations of their works that Newton has worked with or is intending to research,
21 September 2015, 13:00 EDT
New YorkSold for US$68,750 inc. premium
Looking for a similar item?
Our History of Science & Technology specialists can help you find a similar item at an auction or via a private sale.
Find your local specialistAsk about this lot
Client Services (New York)
Client Services (San Francisco)
Client Services (Los Angeles)
NEWTON, ISAAC. 1642-1727.
Autograph Manuscript in Latin, 2 pp, 4to (199 x 155 mm), [np], [c. 1670], being an unpublished listing of chemical authors with some citations of their works that Newton has worked with or is intending to research, some light soiling to edges and a few very minor spots.
VERY RARE UNPUBLISHED MANUSCRIPT WRITTEN AT THE BEGINNING OF HIS CHEMICAL RESEARCHES, in which Newton composes a list of chemical authors (together with some citation of their works) he has either worked with or is intending to research. The authors listed range from Democritus, the ancient proponent of atomic theory, to the Elizabethan scientist/magus John Dee, and include many of the most famous "chymists" and alchemists: e.g. Geber, Basil Valentine, Albertus M[agnus], Arnold de Villa Nova, [Raymond] Lull, Ripley, Sendivogius, Flamel, Marsilio Ficino, and Heinrich Kunrath. The final two lines on the recto (beginning "Tabulae Senioris") single out the illustrations in the work of 4 noted authors. In contradistinction to the text on the recto, which lists authors alphabetically on distinct lines, the text on the verso is written as a paragraph and Newton intercalates the author citations with his own thought and comment. John Dee's work on the Monas Hieroglyphica is especially singled out for its excellence — Newton here writing: "There numbers, points, lines and geometrical figures are used with remarkable industry to signify natural things. Once you put your foot there, more will immediately open." This manuscript bears relationship to Newton's famous "Index Chemicus" which he compiled over the course of years and which ultimately ran to some 100 pages, and is very possibly a first effort to its creation.
The new scholarly paradigm of Isaac Newton evidences the integral linkage of Newton's "chemical philosophy" and his "natural philosophy" (i.e. physics). It is widely recognized that Newton thought chemistry held the solution to "the active cause of gravity" (which the Principia did not provide). Many scholars would argue that Newton's pre-Principia researches into the "active principles" of chemical philosophy had a formative influence on the concept of gravitational force expressed in his natural philosophy — a concept of "attraction" which, in turn, subsequently appears to have framed his post-Principia conclusions about chemical philosophy. The scientific fruit of this mutual intercourse of fields is most prominently evident in Newton's "De natura acidorum," where we observe "the transition from the alchemical concept of active principle to the Newtonian concept of attraction expressed in his own words."
Newton spent some 30 years in the research of chemistry and was highly guarded about his studies throughout his lifetime. Indeed his sole lifetime published work in the field, "De natura acidorum" (printed in Harris' Lexicon Technicum), was perhaps published without his official permission. It is only in recent decades that scholars have had access to Newton's chemical manuscripts and have begun their formal study.
Almost all of Newton's manuscripts are in institutions, and manuscripts bearing on his scientific researches are especially rare in private hands.
VERY RARE UNPUBLISHED MANUSCRIPT WRITTEN AT THE BEGINNING OF HIS CHEMICAL RESEARCHES, in which Newton composes a list of chemical authors (together with some citation of their works) he has either worked with or is intending to research. The authors listed range from Democritus, the ancient proponent of atomic theory, to the Elizabethan scientist/magus John Dee, and include many of the most famous "chymists" and alchemists: e.g. Geber, Basil Valentine, Albertus M[agnus], Arnold de Villa Nova, [Raymond] Lull, Ripley, Sendivogius, Flamel, Marsilio Ficino, and Heinrich Kunrath. The final two lines on the recto (beginning "Tabulae Senioris") single out the illustrations in the work of 4 noted authors. In contradistinction to the text on the recto, which lists authors alphabetically on distinct lines, the text on the verso is written as a paragraph and Newton intercalates the author citations with his own thought and comment. John Dee's work on the Monas Hieroglyphica is especially singled out for its excellence — Newton here writing: "There numbers, points, lines and geometrical figures are used with remarkable industry to signify natural things. Once you put your foot there, more will immediately open." This manuscript bears relationship to Newton's famous "Index Chemicus" which he compiled over the course of years and which ultimately ran to some 100 pages, and is very possibly a first effort to its creation.
The new scholarly paradigm of Isaac Newton evidences the integral linkage of Newton's "chemical philosophy" and his "natural philosophy" (i.e. physics). It is widely recognized that Newton thought chemistry held the solution to "the active cause of gravity" (which the Principia did not provide). Many scholars would argue that Newton's pre-Principia researches into the "active principles" of chemical philosophy had a formative influence on the concept of gravitational force expressed in his natural philosophy — a concept of "attraction" which, in turn, subsequently appears to have framed his post-Principia conclusions about chemical philosophy. The scientific fruit of this mutual intercourse of fields is most prominently evident in Newton's "De natura acidorum," where we observe "the transition from the alchemical concept of active principle to the Newtonian concept of attraction expressed in his own words."
Newton spent some 30 years in the research of chemistry and was highly guarded about his studies throughout his lifetime. Indeed his sole lifetime published work in the field, "De natura acidorum" (printed in Harris' Lexicon Technicum), was perhaps published without his official permission. It is only in recent decades that scholars have had access to Newton's chemical manuscripts and have begun their formal study.
Almost all of Newton's manuscripts are in institutions, and manuscripts bearing on his scientific researches are especially rare in private hands.
Footnotes
ISAAC NEWTON, CHEMICAL PHILOSOPHER.