Sapphire;  compressed rounded shape
Lot 13
A sapphire snuff bottle Possibly Imperial, 1770–1850
Sold for HK$ 780,000 (US$ 100,637) inc. premium

Lot Details
Sapphire;  compressed rounded shape Sapphire;  compressed rounded shape Sapphire;  compressed rounded shape Sapphire;  compressed rounded shape Sapphire;  compressed rounded shape Sapphire;  compressed rounded shape Sapphire;  compressed rounded shape Sapphire;  compressed rounded shape Sapphire;  compressed rounded shape Sapphire;  compressed rounded shape Sapphire;  compressed rounded shape
A sapphire snuff bottle
Possibly Imperial, 1770–1850
5.7cm high.


  • Treasury 3, no. 405


    The Belfort Classic Sapphire

    Sapphire; reasonably well hollowed with a flat lip and flat foot
    Possibly imperial, 1770–1850
    Height: 5.7 cm
    Mouth/lip 0.56/2.14 cm
    Stopper: tourmaline; jadeite collar
    Condition: the usual flaws and inclusions in the original material; one significant chip in outer lip to varying depths, extending 0.9 cm; other minor nibbles around outer lip; what appears to be a crack across the lip is too deep to be and is probably part of an original flaw polished in as part of the original process

    Hugh M. Moss Ltd. (1977)
    Belfort Collection (1986)
    Hugh M. Moss, Ltd 1976, no. 162
    Jutheau 1980, p. 116, fig. 3
    Kleiner 1987, no. 181
    Treasury 3, no. 405

    Hugh M. Moss Ltd., London, 1976
    L'Arcade Chaumet, Paris, June 1982
    Sydney L. Moss Ltd., London, October 1987
    Creditanstalt, Vienna, May–June 1993

    This is one of the best of a series of early sapphire and ruby snuff bottles, several of which are of essentially this same compressed spherical form. For the famous Count Blucher ruby, see Moss, 1971a, no. 103, and for the Beatty example, Chapman 1988 p. 61, fig. 9, where fig. 10 is a related plain sapphire. Another plain, early sapphire bottle similar to this is illustrated in Hamilton 1977, p. 55 no. S–58, and one of a different shape in Ford 1982, no. 58. Another, with mask handles and a band of lappets around the base, was offered by Sotheby's, Hong Kong, 28 October 1992, lot 422, while an old, fruit-form sapphire bottle is illustrated by Stevens 1976, no. 632, where a range of green jadeite bottles of an ovoid form similar to that of the majority of sapphire and ruby examples is also shown (nos. 438–441 and 449). The jadeite bottles probably date from the late Qianlong period into the mid-Qing dynasty, and there is no reason why the ruby and sapphire bottles should not be from much the same period.

    Sapphire and ruby were among the stones classified by the court as 'precious' along with pearls, jadeite, cat's eye and diamonds, while the 'semi-precious' materials were tourmaline, nephrite, amethyst, amber, turquoise, lapis lazuli, coral, quartz, agate, sea shells, tortoise shell and ivory (according to Guoli Gugong bowuyuan 1986, p. 30). The same source informs us that on court belts the use of ruby and sapphire was reserved for the emperor (p. 31). However, this does not mean that the materials were generally restricted to the emperor, since the hat-finial of the first rank of civil or military officials was also of ruby.

    Sapphire and ruby are both of the corundum family and consist of crystals of aluminium oxide. If chromium ions replace the original crystal's aluminium, the result is ruby. The Chinese might have had supplies from Kashmir, famous for its deep cornflower-blue sapphires, but the most likely source on a regular basis would have been Magok in Burma, where mining for both sapphire and ruby had been carried out since the late sixteenth century. This source would certainly have supplied the court after the normalization of relations in 1784 ended a protracted period of hostilities between the two countries, although illicit trade would have been sporadic before that date. We have surmised that this event led to the massive popularity of jadeite, which became well established as a precious stone only in the last decades of the eighteenth century (see Moss, Graham, and Tsang 1993, no. 60) and it seems likely that this group of early sapphire and ruby bottles, which so resemble their many jadeite counterparts, date from the same mid-Qing period and were probably made for the court. Burmese sapphire is characteristically quite heavily flawed, as is the ruby, but this is of little help in a snuff-bottle context where all material large enough to form a snuff bottle is going to be flawed. Another possible source was Thailand, where darker blue sapphires were found in quantity.
    Early examples of sapphire and ruby are among the rarest of snuff bottles, although strangely they do not yet command anything like the prices of their jadeite counterparts which are relatively a good deal more common. This is one of the best of the entire group and in a class with the ruby bottle from the Blucher collection. The colour is extraordinary for so large a piece, deep, vibrant, brilliant and evenly spread throughout the bottle and even the pattern of matrix and paler flaws, which inevitably run through a piece of sapphire this size, are attractive and fascinating as texture. They read like bats flying against a deep azure sky or, to be more realistic, since bats only fly at dusk or during the night, chi dragons frolicking in high summer.

    Harder than jadeite to work, and being a precious material and translucent, sapphire and ruby are never extensively hollowed, although this particular bottle is reasonably well hollowed, even by jadeite standards for the range of bottles of this general shape. It is also achieved through a relatively small mouth, a common feature of the oval bottles in sapphire, ruby or jadeite which may offer a further clue to dating. In 1888, Zhang Yishu wrote some supplementary remarks to Zhao Zhiqian's Yonglu xianjie (see Richard John Lynn's translation, JICSBS Summer, 1995, p. 18). He comments that originally the size of a snuff bottle mouth might exceed 12 mm but that later this changed so they would not exceed 6 mm. He puts no date on this change, but if we look to hardstone bottles with mouths of less than 6 mm for further information, it would seem that by the Qianlong period, and particularly the second half, the smaller mouth was already well established.

    Among the many exclusions from Zhao Zhiqian's references to particular types of snuff bottles in his Yonglu xianjie in the 1860s are ruby and sapphire, but they are today sufficiently rare that many collectors will not have handled one at all and in Zhao's day, long before the copious illustrations of thousands upon thousands of snuff bottles from private and public collections, his range of experience of bottles would almost certainly have been fairly limited. His circle of friends and acquaintances would undoubtedly have provided him with access to a number of bottles, as would frequent visits to the local antique shops, but it is doubtful if he saw in his entire span of interest in the subject anything like as much as we have available to us today, given an hour or two with our many publications. Nor would he have had access to the imperial Collection, as we have today through exhibition and publication. Although well qualified, and renowned for his painting and calligraphy, Zhao was never offered an official position at court and died a disappointed man because of it (see JICSBS Summer, 1995, p.10). It seems unlikely that Zhao would not have mentioned sapphire and ruby snuff bottles if he had come across them since, having commented that jadeite was too hard a stone to hollow out properly, he would surely have been impressed by the hollowing of a stone many times harder.
    Although marginally too large by modern aesthetic standards, the stopper here is sumptuously matched with its rare and prominent jadeite collar and tourmaline cabochon. It is, however, extremely practical, allowing a firm grip for its removal, however tight the cork might have been, and we may be certain that convenience of function in stoppering would have influenced aesthetics to some extent during the Qing dynasty.



    高:5.7 厘米

    Hugh M. Moss Ltd (1987)
    Belfort珍藏 (1986)

    Hugh M. Moss Ltd 1976, 編號162
    Jutheau 1980, 頁116,圖3
    Kleiner 1987, 編號181
    Treasury 3, 編號405

    Hugh M. Moss Ltd, 倫敦, 1976年
    L'Arcade Chaumet, 巴黎, 1982年6月
    Sydney L. Moss Ltd, 倫敦, 1987年10 月
    Creditanstalt, 維也納, 1993年5月至6月

    這是早期藍寶石與紅寶石鼻煙壺最佳品之一,該系列煙壺中有些是與本壺同樣的扁圓形。可以參照有名的布呂歇爾伯爵 (Kurt Blücher von Wahlstatt, Graf) 收藏所收紅寶石 (Hugh Moss 1971a, 編號103) 和Beatty 珍藏所收的兩壺 (Chapman 1988, 頁61,圖9、10, 後者為相關的無花紋藍寶石壺)。與本壺類似的有發表在Hamilton 1977, 頁55(編號S-58壺),還有形式不同的發表在Ford 1982 的編號58壺。兩側浮雕獸面的有蘇富比香港1992年10月28日拍賣的422拍賣品號,水果形藍寶石煙壺有Stevens 1976發表的編號632。Stevens 1976編號438~441與449是類似多數的藍寶石、紅寶石煙壺的圓形翡翠鼻煙壺,大約是乾隆期至清朝中期製的,按情理來推論,藍寶石煙壺和紅寶石煙壺的製作時期應該是相差無幾的。


    早期的藍寶石與紅寶石鼻煙壺頗稀罕,奇怪的是,他們不像相對普遍的、極相像的翡翠煙壺價格那麼貴。本壺是早期藍寶石煙壺中相當良好的,跟布呂歇爾伯爵珍藏收的紅寶石煙壺一樣的超群絕倫。其顏色鮮濃而均勻地分布於全壺,這麼大一塊藍寶石必具的脈石和淡色的疵瑕顯現出有意思的、悅目的紋理,令人想到蝙蝠飛翔於深藍色的天空,或是(因為蝙 蝠白天不露面),

    藍寶石和紅寶石都比翡翠硬,一般是膛掏得不太徹底,但盡管跟形式大體上與本壺一樣的翡翠煙壺比較,本壺的確掏得不錯, 而且是由比較小的口掏的。藍寶石壺、紅寶石壺、和翡翠壺,口經常是小的,這或許會給我們提供確定時期的線索。張義澍1888年所編撰《士那補釋》說鼻煙壺的口本來有寬於12毫米者,後來,新模式口寬不會超過6毫米的。張義澍並沒有指明模式轉變的時期,不過,看小口硬石煙壺的典型實例,可以推測,乾隆期,特別是乾隆後半期,口寬限於6 毫米的模式已經出現了。


Auction information

This sale is now finished. If you are interested in consigning in future sales, please contact the specialist department. If you have queries about lots purchased in this sale, please contact customer services.

Buyers' Obligations


If you have any complaints or questions about the Conditions of Sale, please contact your nearest customer services team.

Buyers' Premium and Charges

For all Sales categories excluding Wine:

Buyer's Premium Rates
25% up to HKD800,000 of the Hammer Price
20% from HKD800,001 to HKD15,000,000 of the Hammer Price
12% over HKD15,000,000 of the Hammer Price.

Shipping Notices

For information and estimates on domestic and international shipping as well as export licences please contact Bonhams Shipping Department.

Similar Items